Struggling to Fill the Gap: Equity and Access Practices of Arts Administrators in Out-of-School Educational Theatre Programs for New York City Public School Students

Below you will find the abstract from my capstone thesis paper, a comparative study of four non-profit educational theatre organisations who serve New York City Public School students, submitted in partial fulfilment of my masters degree in arts administration from Teachers College, Columbia University.

As funding for in-school arts education decreases, many young people turn to out-of-school educational theatre programs run by professional theatres or community-based organizations. Due to ingrained habits of white supremacy and colonial/settler thinking in these settings, educational theatre opportunities for Black and Latine youth are well below that of white students, despite countless studies demonstrating the positive impact of comprehensive arts education on all aspects of life for young people. This paper utilizes a theory devised by Dr. Amelia Kraehe at the University of Arizona who posits that equity in arts education contains six Dimensions: resources, access, participation, recognition, transformation, and effects. Equity is only achieved when equilibrium between the Dimensions is reached. Knowing we, as a society, are far from achieving equilibrium, this research paper focuses on how Education Directors at non-profit arts organizations achieve the profound effects noted in prior research despite living in a society designed to make this difficult and often designed to make equity impossible. Through semi-structured interviews with four Education Directors in out-of-school educational theatre programs, two at off-Broadway cultural institutions and two at community-based organizations, serving New York City public school students, we learn how and why they prioritize recognition over other Dimensions. Education Directors in this comparative case study have a commitment to undoing harmful Euro-centric theatre traditions and to center the lived experiences of youth participants who are predominantly racialized as Black and Latine. Education Directors are unwilling to sacrifice comprehensive and intentional classroom experiences for youth participants and put their limited financial resources towards building authentic relationships with participants, teaching artists, and the communities they serve. Due to these priorities, which are intentional and take time to enact, Education Directors are only able provide programming to a limited number of young people, pointing to a significant need for more expansive funding for arts education that decenters neo-liberal paradigms. Future research on this topic could include a quantitative study on how arts are funded in New York City public schools, and a wider study of equity practices amongst Education Directors in both community-based organizations and cultural institutions.

What Now?

A wider quantitative survey of how administrators who are New York Arts in Education Roundtable member organizations prioritize the Dimensions of Equity is suggested. This study would yield useful insight on consistency of data, and how size, location, and student population impact the Dimensions of Equity, ultimately helping shape further research on resource allocation and access.

A quantitative study on funding allotments for out-of-school arts education organizations based on race, modeled after the Asian American Performers Action Coalition 2019 Visibility Report that studied the impact of white supremacy in the New York theatre industry including the impact of racism on the current funding paradigm (Bandhu and Hanzelka Kim, 2019, 19), could better inform arts education advocates on how white supremacy functions in the arts education funding paradigm and how to better advocate for new paradigms.

Lastly, more study on arts education in New York City is needed. Almost no scholarship exists on how and why principals choose to allocate resources to the arts. Data yielded through comprehensive study on this topic could vastly impact advocacy work. Likewise, a study of success rates of NYCAIER’s lobbying techniques would help advocates better understand what successful communication with large bureaucracy yields.

If you are interesting in learning more or expanding the study, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with me at ebd2138@tc.columbia.edu.

Next
Next

Devised Theatre for New Masculinities